"This is perfectly bonkers." Jonathan Turley unloads on the Clancy defense's attempt to appeal the judge's mistrial declaration, arguing the objection comes far too late and warning the legal theory is "bordering, in my view, on the frivolous." Turley explains that even if the jury is in fact split 11-1 in Clancy's favor, the result is still a mistrial. He adds prosecutors could choose to try the case again, but would have to consider whether they can realistically convince all 12 jurors next time. Watch Turley's analysis here 👇 ▻