What just happened with the holdout juror discussion in court: -Prosecution said no indication of bias, lack to deliberate, or lack of impartiality. Does not think juror should have to be questioned -Defense said the juror looked judge in the eye and lied under oath. Said this person has acknowledged doubt but refuses to apply it. Also said there were two notes delivered. -Unless it was a slip up or accident, Reddington referred to the holdout juror as “he” multiple times -Judge says he is not going to question juror and they will continue deliberations