🚨 NEW: Fox News panel SLAMS MS Now for interrupting Trump’s U.N. speech with a failed ‘fact check’ Trace Gallagher: “I mean, the whole thing is you want to criticize the president and then you screw up the criticism. It’s a bad look when you get the fact and you have to fact-check yourself!” LA Mom Magazine’s Shirin Yadegar: “Well, if you’re going to interrupt the president for fact-checking, then make sure you’re going to do it across the board, right? You can’t just interrupt the president and fact-check him. You’ve got to do this with everyone if it’s real objective journalism.” “Why is it that it’s only the president of the United States who gets this live scrutiny? When we go to journalism school, we learn about objective journalism. This is activism. This is not journalism. These gotcha moments that they’re trying to do—if you’re gonna do it, at least make sure you get your facts right,” adds @​LAMomMagazine. TRACE: “I mean, you know, you cut away from the president every time you do that, just because you disagree with the president, you wanna take a swing. I mean, you’d never get through any kind of United Nations speech, you’d never get through anything. Come on, it’s fair to put the speech on there, and when the speech is concluded, you go back and you analyze it, but to cut away in the middle just so you can take a couple swings. Jeff, your thoughts?” @​JeffVaughn adds: “I’m okay with them fact-checking, but it seems like they wanna interrupt and get the last word, and that really is the control here.” “The media’s full of elitists, and they think that they know better than President Trump or whoever happens to be on the right, right? And so they interrupt, they wanna do everything they can to make sure they get their word in edgewise before the president doe